Reasons for War

Sunday February 12, 2006 ~ Typically Sunday should be spent worshiping and resting but these days God does not take time off because of situations such as ~ Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of Iran, simply does not trust the Tony Blair, George I & II Bush, Cheney, CABAL ~ Could this be one of the reasons he is behaving like a madman?

~ visual iconography about the true story of the United States of America as it evolves into the 21st Century ~ works of art by an eclectic master artist who is a true patriot of the Planet Earth ~

    WHY, How dare the President of a modern people require Israel, Turkey, UK, US, France, Germany and Italy, and all other countries with WMDs, to disarm their nuclear weapons programs.  How could a President be so arrogant and feel justified in demanding that Israel and Turkey do not 'preemptively' attack his country with nuclear missiles!  After all, pretending the strike is not provoked and carried out by the US, UK, and the other European Nations is easy and proving the absolute truth backed up with undisputed facts these days is not at all easy.  And of course we have pledged our allegiance to Israel.  Does the name Jack Abramoff ring any bells with respect to ~ "Israel the 51st State of the US"?
    Also, it appears that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may very well be disgruntled with the US for being a primary weapons supplier of Weapons of Mass Destruction to Turkey and Israel.  Another name connected to the investigative research of illegal weapons trade to Turkey via the US ~ Valerie Plame. Oh, I almost forgot!  She and her entire operation is defunct and out of the business of keeping track of our clandestine weapons trading in Turkey.  Wow, the US and Valerie Plame have none other than Dick Cheney himself to thank for keeping us safe.
    ". . Iran has been in the gun-sights of George W. Bush and his entourage from the moment that he was parachuted into the presidency in November 2000 by his father’s Supreme Court" . . con't ~ Michael Keefer
    ". . Iran is preparing a world without Israel and the USA snip US dollar is an overvalued currency whose value is maintained essentially by its role as a petro-currency". . con't ~ by  Thierry  Meyssan
    No civilized governing country wants Iran to be on their level playing field with the same nuclear weapons and the US thinks that since America's leaders have decided we are the Empire, we determine who has WMDs and who does not.  Why  would other countries not want the US to be the leader on planet Earth with nuclear arsenals?  Have we indicated somehow that we can wipe them entirely off the face of the Earth and rightfully claim what belongs to the Empire ~ all the natural resources, etc. ~ so we can continue being the United States of Gluttonous Consumerism.  Plus, the bonus is that we get to send shock waves of abject terror throughout the world by creating another Hiroshima.  After all, we have more than proven in Iraq that our sincere strategy is to obliterate liberate, so what the heck is wrong with other people and their trust issues.  Furthermore, God as our supreme warrior blessed US with the most WMDs to annihilate all those who are not God's true children; and, Bush/Cheney, as well as the multi-billionaire war mongers, are obviously those in control of the Divine Plan of God which has been labeled the Project for a New American Century.
    ". . The dramatis personae include the Bush Administration, most especially the Cheney-led neo-conservative hawks in control now of not only the Pentagon, but also the CIA, the UN Ambassadorship and a growing part of the State Department planning bureaucracy under Condi Rice" . . con't ~ William Engdahl
    ". . The United States Pentagon, CIA, “reliable replacement warhead” programme snip The US has already spent about $60 billion maintaining and refurbishing its weapons under a separate programme, called “stockpile stewardship” snip the San Francisco Chronicle interviewed the head of the NNSA, Linton Brookes. “I don’t want to mislead you,” he admitted. “I will personally be very surprised if we can get the advantages we want without redesigning the physics package.”
    ". . Nothing could make us less secure than the billions we are spending in the name of security" . . con't ~ George Monbiot
    And the drums of war are beaten by the madmen, again and again, until we are no more I guess.  How can these fools convince themselves that this behavior of absolute madness is sane, civilized and from GOD, Amen?

    Should any human being on this planet question the motives of this particular group of governing thugs ~ read what Michael Ruppert has investigated.
    Also, the International Commission on Crimes Against Humanity is a tragic but hopeful vision into what the mainstream media chooses to censor.

Comments

[Roberta Kelly]

Albert Einstein said this about war and I concur, 100% --

"He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt.

He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.

This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action.

It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder."

[roberta]

“. . The construction of the public monopolies [states] was ... intimately bound up with war against other states. Cosmopolitanism and organized violence."

An essay written by Mary Kaldor, of the London School of Economics, who is a student of war.

(“She subscribes to what I believe is a crackpot theory of “global cosmopolitanism,” but she has written insightfully - if in a fragmentary and eurocentric way = about the evolution of something she calls the “new war.” www.fromthewilderness.com”)

“Inter-state war became the only legitimate form of organized violence, and, moreover, was sharply distinguished from peace. In place of more or less continuous warfare, war became a discrete episode that was reserved for use against other states and was excluded from internal relations. Domestic pacification (the elimination of private armies, the reduction of corruption, violent crime, piracy and brigandage), the growth of taxation and public borrowing, the regularization of armed forces and police forces, the development of nationalist sentiment, were all mutually reinforcing in wartime. Essentially, the social contract associated with the construction of the nation-state could be said to have taken the following form; civil and political rights could be guaranteed in exchange for paying taxes and fighting in wars. The individual rights that citizens enjoyed in peacetime were exchanged for the abrogation of those rights in wartime. In wartime the citizens became part of a collectivity, the nation, and had to be ready to die for the state. In exchange for individual civil and political rights in peacetime, the citizen accepted a kind of unlimited liability in wartime. Hence, [Norbert] Elias writing just before the Second World War, feared that the civilizing process would be engulfed by the barbarity of war.

Inter-state war is sometimes described as Clausewitzean war. The wars of classical modernity had a kind of extremist logic that is well analyzed by Clausewitz. As war became more extreme and terrible, so the social contract was extended, reaching its logical end point during the Cold War. Essentially, during this period, there were unprecedented gains in economic and social rights. But the risks were also dramatically extended. The price of these gains, during this period, was readiness to risk a nuclear war.”