What does it mean? Further, why are sites such as this one ready for the pro se, however, the dead-end appears to be on purpose?
"... This website is designed as a resource center on self-representation in civil legal matters. Our purpose is to provide a collection of materials and resources that can be used to create legal service delivery systems that are based on the concept of "pro se" or "self" representation within federally funded legal services programs, courts, pro bono programs, and other community-based programs.
Pro Se means "on one's own behalf." A 1991 American Bar Association study of self-represented litigants showed:
- Persons with incomes less than $50,000 are more likely to represent themselves.
- About 20% of self-represented litigants report they can afford an attorney but do not want one.
- Self-represented persons are more likely to be satisfied with the judicial process than those who are represented by attorneys.
- Almost 75% of those who represented themselves in court said they would do it again.
Self-representation, when combined with the power of
modern information technology can be an important means of providing
increased access to the legal system.
This resource center contains:
-
A searchable Directory of Pro Se Programs operated by legal service providers;
-
White papers and research on the research concept;
-
A Discussion space where organizations that want to design and operate pro se assistance programs can post questions and receive answers from other
professionals who are engaged in operating pro se programs.
When pro se sites are accessed, the links which send an email to the responsible legal party are either being intentionally corrupted, or what exactly is the agenda in the US with respect to the idea of self representation in the court system?
The problem with America is the fact that we have forgotten our rights as a Constitutional Republic and also, we have allowed a class of American humans (lawyers) to speak for us and this plus only the attorneys-at-law going into to the courts and demonstrating the smarts to defend/protect and represent "law" ... we the ordinary people are not allowed, AND this manufactures what it is: dummies.
It is time. Here we are in the 21st Century and, therefore, we are certainly more than able to begin showing up into the courts and and compete with our own individual intelligence, because we can. Why? We ALL POSSESS the same brain/s, and there are no exceptions to this rule even with the poisons attacking our minds via the central nervous system (see Pavlov and Stain in the 1920s, the lab experiments RE: TERRORISM).
Comments